Reading history

Reading history is a metaphorical investigation of the structures of history, artistic practices and in a sense, life of each individual. It provides structural frames, based on the construction of the ancient Chinese board game weiqi, in English known as Go, to Martychowiec’s practice as a whole.

As he writes ‘the stone itself is a nothing, but when placed on the board it becomes representation of an idea. It is, indeed, so much alike any gesture of an artist, where the medium is a mere representation of the concept, and which once committed, remains and influences not only what precedes it, but most importantly what follows.’

Upon creation of an idea (either within a game or an artistic practice) its meaning or significance might not be clear, neither for the spectator, nor its creator, and one might have to wait for what is to follow in order for the true meaning of the gesture to surface. Of course, there are these ‘moves’ in the game, or these artistic gestures or events in history, which are groundbreaking. They change the meaning and significance of history and time (they give meaning to the past and they create the future), or they change the meaning of anything the artist has committed up to that time.

The structure of Go, as mentioned, being so alike to that of history, provides an interesting parallel. For those knowing nothing of the game’s structure, the large-format photographs of the chosen moments of historical games, mean no more than geometrical compositions. This aesthetic layer is important because it has always been inseparable from art (for history has taught us rejection of any aesthetics, like in the case of minimalism, leads only to creation of new aesthetics). But those who know of the game, or even more so, the ones who are masters of it, are capable of reading far more from that one simple geometrical composition: they might be able to estimate its placement on the timeline of history, and tell about emotions or approach of those who played it, perhaps even guess the players’ age, they might be able to, with some degree of error, reconstruct the order in which the stones were placed, and then, of course, they might be able to make realistic guesses of what followed and what was the game’s result. This can be said equally about historians and about those who are learnt to read cultural tropes, symbols and relics.

The historical value of Go is unprecedented, for as much as many of historical documents in China have not been preserved, records of Go games played have been kept, and the oldest available to us date to as early as AD 196. The project thus, as its title would suggest, is structured not through creation of game arrangements, but through reenactment of historical games. It is thus divided into different serial elements, among other objects, they create sub-series of:

actual full reenactments of historical games (eg. Reading history 2016-1846), which are developed on a wooden board throughout the duration of exhibitions and influence the context, meaning and framework of all the works of art around them

large format photographs reenacting and depicting chosen moments from games in Go history (e.g. Reading history #1 (2018-196) )

large format photographs documenting notes, images and objects placed within the frame of historical games, under the title Notes from the board

and lastly, historical stones, functioning similarly to framed relics under the title Naming history (e.g. Naming history #2 (2017-1710) ). Here the approach is slightly different and connected to the initially quoted statement of Martychowiec. Following the original context, one could say the stones hold both all the ideas they were used to represent, and ideas they can still be used to represent. The latter applies up to the point, they are chosen by the artist, aesthetised (they become works of art and can no longer be used to represent new ideas) and given meaning, based purely on the artistic decision rather than scholastic study, and so in this case: by placing them in the context of history, and by placing them in a context of another historical game.


Reading history 2016-1846

(2016) re-enactment of a historical game

Alphabetically A.A.I.N.S.T.V.

(2010) 7 typescripts framed in glass on a shelf

Banana a banana

(2011) HD Video

Reading history #1 (2018-196)

(2018) chromogenic print 90x97 cm

Looking for meaning in history

(2017) neon 26x200 cm

Notes from the board

(2018) chromogenic prints 90x97 cm

Naming history #1 (2017-1846): Death of Plutarch

(2017) arrangement of framed clamshell and slate Go stones

Naming history #2 (2017-1710): The Great Pyramid of the Sun

(2017) arrangement of framed clamshell and slate Go stones

Naming history #3 (2017-1861): Martha of Bethany Travels to Avignon

(2017) arrangement of framed clamshell and slate Go stones

Naming history #4 (2018-800): Time of Void

(2018) arrangement of framed clamshell and slate Go stones